PACQUIAO WATCH: Controversy good for Pacquiao
By Edwin G. Espejo
PhilBoxing.com
Tue, 18 Mar 2008
ALTHOUGH in my own scorecard Manny Pacquiao won in his rematch with Juan Manuel Marquez even if I may have erred in giving him the last round, it was a close decision nonetheless.
But it would be the height of stupidity and arrogance to call the decision a highway robbery as Marquez' trainer Nacho Beristain harped and would like us to believe.
To do so is to deny both fighters their proper place in one of the most memorable fights in the super featherweight history.
Pacquiao and Marquez are like the ivory and ebony keys of the piano that without each other, they would not make good melody. They are like sodas that without one serving as a tightly lid cap, there would be no pop. They are a study of contrast and, like opposite poles of a magnet, they attract. That is why the thin line of choosing who the better fighter is like choosing which is better, night or day?
And comparisons such as these will invariably spill over to giving verdict to a fight that is as close as your eyelids can be to your eyes.
All things considered, the narrow split decision awarded to Pacquiao and the arguments that followed it are good for boxing. And good for both boxers, too.
For Marquez, his two close fights with Pacquiao are what cemented his claim as one of the best boxers in the featherweight division in his era. Without Pacquiao, Marquez would have wallowed in anonymity as nobody would dare touch him even with a totem pole four years ago.
Nothing to be ashamed of for those two close calls. Although he may have suffered the worst beatings in his career via those four knockdowns in two fights, Marquez proved his resilience and durability by coming back strong enough to redeem himself.
Their two fights will still be debated long after their careers in boxing are over. And to my recollection, no other rivalry matched the intensity of the debate of the results of each of their fights. Only a decisive and convincing victory in a third and decisive match will put a close to the debate. But there are many ifs - if that third time happens and if the result will not be as close as the first two.
When the dust of the debate is over, the two will always be cited in tandem for their great encounters. Their careers will forever be intertwined and no one will be mentioned without each other when defining the highlights of their careers.
Along with Marco Antonio Barrera and Erik Morales, Pacquiao and Marquez formed the other half of the quartet that restored respectability and excitement to the sports. The four may not share the same table and may loathe to be seated next to each other in the same couch of a train (with the exception of Pacquiao and Morales who have since become bosom friends and appeared in several beer commercials). But their respective rivalries are comparable to the era of Sugar Ray Leonard-Roberto Duran-Thomas Hearns-Marvin Hagler in the welterweight division, a period that produced some of the finest and fiercest competitors the sport has ever seen. Like the illustrious welterweight quartet in the 1980's, where one could be as dominant as the other on any given day, Pacquiao and Marquez and their contemporaries are becoming legends in their own right.
But it is Pacquiao who stands several cuts above them.
His narrow win over Marquez gave him the edge over the three other Hall-of-Fame bound boxers.
With still a good two or three years of competitive boxing ahead of him, Pacquiao's stock will continue to rise.
And with a display of endurance and longevity to go along with his superior skills, Marquez will continue to find himself in money bouts which eluded him when Barrera and Morales declined to fight him during their prime.
Pacquiao will be on course to rewrite records he already established in the world of professional boxing.
A third and conclusive fight between the two great fighters could happen, as many are now clamoring for it to happen.
It could come in the right time and for the right reward. But certainly not when one or both are already on the downslide.
To do that when the either of the two are no longer compettive would be a travesty to the sports and the prestige the two and their equally deserving contemporaries have brought to boxing.
Click here to view a list of other articles written by Edwin G. Espejo.
Recent PhilBoxing.com In-House articles:
Boxing Golden Age Comparison - Philippines and Japan
By Teodoro Medina Reynoso, Fri, 04 Jul 2025Kittipong, Magdalena, Kim, Kritiphak Claim Wins in Brico Santig's Show in Bangkok
By Carlos Costa, Fri, 04 Jul 2025Kremlev, Crawford, Fury Launch IBA's Golden Era of International Boxing
Fri, 04 Jul 2025International Master Angelo Young stays on course for GM norm
By Marlon Bernardino, Fri, 04 Jul 2025Robby Gonzales and Yoseline Perez Progress to Semifinals at World Boxing Cup: Astana 2025
Fri, 04 Jul 2025Fireworks Ahead: Magsayo vs Mata in Prelims of Pacquiao vs Barrios
By Carlos Costa, Thu, 03 Jul 2025Japan's Boxing Golden Age Remains Limited to the Lower Weights
By Teodoro Medina Reynoso, Thu, 03 Jul 2025No issues with fight ref
By Joaquin Henson, Thu, 03 Jul 2025Round 12 with Mauricio Sulaimàn: Grand Muay Thai event in Verona
By Mauricio Sulaimán, Thu, 03 Jul 2025Morelle McCane and Rene Camacho Advance to Quarterfinals of World Boxing Cup: Astana 2025
Thu, 03 Jul 20253 Division World Champion & Hall of Famer Marco Antonio Barrera Confirmed for Eighth Annual Box Fan Expo, During Mexican Independence Day Weekend, Saturday September 13, in Las Vegas
Thu, 03 Jul 2025ESPN Original Series The Fight Life Returns for Season Two on July 7
Wed, 02 Jul 2025TOP-RATED LIGHTWEIGHT KO ARTIST ARMANDO MARTINEZ RABI RETURNS
Wed, 02 Jul 2025Amazing Muay Thai WBC Festival 2025
Wed, 02 Jul 2025Borromeo Leads Winners of the Philippine Speedcubing Championships
By Marlon Bernardino, Wed, 02 Jul 2025